Eye Evolution

This page has content that requires the Flash Player plug-in. Unfortunately, we can't do anything on our end to improve your experience with Flash. If you are using an iOS device, please note that these devices do not support Flash. We are slowly working on replacing our popular Flash-based content and will update this content as it becomes available. If you would like to help us as we work on these updates, please consider donating here.

The overwhelming majority of life on our planet depends on the sun for energy. Because life is so tightly linked to the sun, it is no surprise that many organisms (excluding those that live in total darkness) have evolved the ability to detect and respond to light. Plants turn their leaves toward the sun. Single-celled algae, protists, and other microbes swim toward or away from light. But it is the animals, with our image-forming eyes, that have taken light detection to the next level.

96% of animal species have eyes. The first animal eyes did little but detect light—they helped to establish day/night cycles and coordinate behavior—but more-complex eyes soon evolved. A predator who can see its prey from a distance, or a prey animal that can see the shadow of a predator approaching, has a clear survival advantage over those who can't. Even a slight improvement in image quality provides a significant survival advantage, allowing for the step-by-step evolution of increasingly complex eyes.

starfish on coral

By synchronizing their reproductive cycles with the sun and the moon, some species of coral manage to spawn during a single hour of the year. Light detection may have first evolved to set up rhythms and routines for feeding, movement, and reproduction. (Photo: Emma Hickerson, NOAA)

Photo Credits
  1. Antonio Guillén
  2. Ashe-Villain
  3. David Muller
  4. Steve Jurvetson
  5. Hans Hillewaert
  6. Michael Steirwald
  7. Kevin Collins
  8. Rob Knell
  9. Kevin Collins
  10. Colin Purrington
  11. Tamara Frank
  12. TwelveX
  13. g-na
  14. LotusMonger, Mark Fickett
  15. Kevin Collins
  16. Doug Anderson, Roy Caldwell

Light Detection, Pigment, and Movement Make an Eye

At its simplest, the eye incorporates three functions:

  1. Light detection
  2. Shading, in the form of dark pigment, for sensing the direction light is coming from
  3. Connection to motor structures, for movement in response to light
some organisms, all three of these functions are carried out by just one cell—the single-celled euglena is one example. It has a light-sensitive spot, pigment granules for shading, and motor cilia. This structure, however, isn't considered a true eye.

most-basic structure that is widely accepted as an eye has just two cells: a photoreceptor that detects light, and a pigment cell that provides shading. The photoreceptor connects to ciliated cells, which engage to move the animal in response to light. The marine ragworm embryo (right) has a two-celled eye.

Two celled eye

The Evolution of Image-forming Eyes

An eye with more photoreceptors has more power: it can detect variations in light intensity across its surface. A cup-shaped eye can better sense both the direction light is coming from and the movement of nearby objects. These improvements require only minor changes to the basic eye.

As animals evolved more-complex bodies and behaviors, the eye too became more complex. Eyes evolved connections to muscle cells rather than cells that moved by waving cilia. Neurons evolved that could process signals and coordinate behavior.

Later improvements included structures for better optics, such as lenses or mirrors that gather and focus light onto photoreceptors. Some eyes became spherical and evolved pupils that opened and closed to let in just the right amount of light for forming clear images. Muscles evolved to fine-tune focusing and to point the eye in different directions. Photoreceptors increased in number, providing more-detailed images (like adding pixels to a photograph).

complex eyes

Stepping Up to a Complex Eye

diverse eyes

On the inside, diverse eyes use some of the very same components—a basic molecular "toolkit" for building an eye. However, some structures that look alike, for example vertebrate and squid lenses, have different evolutionary origins.

Learn more about the molecular "toolkit" for building an eye, and the genetic origin of eyes.

Eyes most likely evolved from simple to complex through a gradual series of tiny steps. Piecing together the sequence of eye evolution is challenging, and we don't know the sequence of steps that led to every modern eye. But we do know that modern animal eyes come in many varieties, spanning a continuum from the simplest to the most complex. This demonstrates that all types of eyes are useful, and that eyes of intermediate complexity could also have formed as steps in the evolution of complex eyes.

Researchers at Lund University wanted to find out how long it might take for a complex eye to evolve. Starting with a flat, light-sensitive patch, they gradually made over 1,800 tiny improvements—forming a cup, constricting the opening, adding a lens—until they had a complex, image-forming eye. It is important to note that every tiny change these researchers made measurably improved image quality. The researchers concluded that these steps could have taken place in about 360,000 generations, or just a few hundred thousand years. 550 million years have passed since the formation of the oldest fossil eyes, enough time for complex eyes to have evolved more than 1,500 times.

To learn more, view the short video about how the eye could have evolved through a series of tiny steps.


Arendt, D., Hausen, H., Purschke, G. (2009). The 'division of labour' model of eye evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences, 364(1531), 2809-2817. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0104

Lamb, T. D., Collin, S. P., Pugh, Jr., E. N. (2007). Evolution of the vertebrate eye: opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 960-976 (subscription required). doi:10.1038/nrn2283

Nilsson, D.-E. (2009). The evolution of eyes and visually guided behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences, 364(1531), 2833-2847. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0083

Nilsson, D.-E. & Pelger, S. (1994). A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological sciences, 256, 53-58 (subscription required).

Shubin, N., Tabin, C., & Carroll, S. (2009). Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty. Nature, 457, 818-823 (subscription required). doi:10.1038/nature07891

Vopalensky, P. & Kozmik, Z. (2009). Eye evolution: common use and independent recruitment of genetic components. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences, 364(1531), 2819-2832. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0079

APA format:

Genetic Science Learning Center. (2014, December 1) Eye Evolution. Retrieved September 22, 2023, from https://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/senses/eye/

CSE format:

Eye Evolution [Internet]. Salt Lake City (UT): Genetic Science Learning Center; 2014 [cited 2023 Sep 22] Available from https://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/senses/eye/

Chicago format:

Genetic Science Learning Center. "Eye Evolution." Learn.Genetics. December 1, 2014. Accessed September 22, 2023. https://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/senses/eye/.